A inscrição da subjetividade na escrita acadêmica: análise de TCCs do curso de Letras de uma universidade pública do Paraná

Abstract

Academic genres focused on scientific research tend to have styles characterized by objectivity, neutrality and impersonality. These styles, in most cases, are linked to both institutional processes and to both institutional processes and discursive regimes of legitimacy and recognition. Scientificity being one of the most penetrating forces in these type texts. The mutation vectors of the genres are diverse, as are the stabilization vectors. These two forces: mutability/transformation, and stabilization act on academic/scientifics texts, producing creativity or reiterating crystallized forms of scientific legitimacy. The Course Conclusion Papers undergraduated, as academic genres and as scientific texts, have characteristics that are their own, carry very peculiar traits in relation to the other scientific productions within which they emerge and insert themselves dialogically. It is, precisely, the peculiarity presented by this gender that this investigative study seeks to highlight. Thus, we aim to observe how academic how academic genres resulting from the Course Conclusion Papers undergraduated of a course of Letters in the region of Campos Gerais in Paraná are constituted in what concerns the various forms of inscription of subjectivity in the text from a politically situated power and authority structure .This is done in the light of the enunciative perspective linked to the theory of Academic Literacies and Discourse Genres, anchored in a dialogical understanding of language. The locus of the study is a undergraduate education in Letters form a Public Univesity of Paraná and the corpus of analysis consists of 46 Course Conclusion Papers undergraduated defended in 2018. The theoretical assumptions for this investigation are distributed among the areas of New Studies of Literacy (STREET, 2010, 1994, 1982; LEA;STREET, 2014; KLEMAN, 1995), Bakhtin Circle Discourse Studies (BAKHTIN, 1997, 2002, 2006), and Enunciative Studies (BENVENISTE, 1989; AUTHIER-REVUZ, 1990, 2004). This framework is allied to the field of Studies of Writting at the University (STREET 2010; 1982), (LEA E STREET, 2014; IVANIC, 1998; RUSSERL, 2009; MARINHO, 2010; MACEDO; PAGANO, 2001) and studies of writing in an enunciative perspective (JURADO FILHO, 1996; MESCHONIC, 2006; DALEHT, 2006, 2002; JUNG;SALEH, 2011; SALEH, 2017; SGARBOSSA, 2015; DELEZUK, 2015). The conception adopted is that of heteregeneous way of constitution (CORREA, 1997). The main line of the study being the dialogical perspective based on (BAKHTIN 1997, 2002, 2006). In terms of results, it was observed the close link between the scope of linguistic resources, the socio-political, cultural and historical ones with the subjectivity, the sense and subjectivity; that is, between genre styles and individual styles, consequently, the inseparability between these levels intertwined in an indissoluble whole, the statement, which this study seeks to lay bare.