A função social do Núcleo de Prática Jurídica da Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa no acesso à justiça

Abstract

This thesis addresses the issue of access to justice and the social function of the Center for Legal Practice at the State University of Ponta Grossa. It is considered a historical perspective of the right of access to justice in Brazil highlighting the Constitution of 1988. The amendments put by the Constitution of 1988 refers to the elevation of the right to access to justice, fundamental right of the individual and replacing the term legal assistance, and the constituent has chosen to use the term full legal assistance, covering not only the assistance judicial, but the real objective inclusion of the individual within society. To this end, the constituent has delegated the provision of full legal assistance to the Ombudsman, which should be implemented in all member states, a fact not realized until the present. For analysis of the social function of NPJ / UEPG breaks Ordinance 1886/94, in which the MEC established the obligation of the practical training of students of Law Courses. Considering the absence of the Public Defender in all member states, these law firms eventually absorb part of their dispute should be housed by the state. This research has a qualitative and exploratory. Data collection was conducted through secondary sources such as literature and doctrine and primary sources such as documentary data, questionnaires and observation. The research objectives were to reflect on access to justice as a civil right and fundamental human right, describe the evolution of the constitutional provision the right of access to justice in Brazil and to analyze the social function of NPJ / UEPG access to justice. The dissertation is organized as follows: in the first chapter talks about the formation of the modern state and access to justice as a right of citizenship. In the second chapter discusses the evolution of the right to access to justice in Brazil and the innovations contained in the Constitution of 1988. Finally, the third chapter addressed the social function of NPJ / UEPG access to justice, presents data collected from the NPJ / UEPG and position of members of the prosecution and the judiciary.